Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:27

What’s next?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Astros Announce Major Trade With Rays After Yordan Alvarez News - Athlon Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Americans Are Growing Less Interested in Buying Electric Vehicles, Study Says - Road & Track
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Where can Ukrainians go if they cannot have shelter and heating this winter?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Which is the best protein water in India for muscle gain?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
24 Tech Products You'll Want To Add To Your Routine ASAP - BuzzFeed
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Would the word literate carry the same meaning with public (common wealth) in 1900 vs today 2020?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.